Lloyd v. Carnation Co.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Lloyd v. Carnation Co.

266 S.E.2d 722, 47 N.C. App. 203, 1980 N.C. App. LEXIS 3003

CourtCourt of Appeals of North Carolina

DecidedJune 3, 1980

DocketNo. 7915SC1120

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 266 S.E.2d 722 (Lloyd v. Carnation Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lloyd v. Carnation Co., 266 S.E.2d 722, 47 N.C. App. 203, 1980 N.C. App. LEXIS 3003 (N.C. Ct. App. 1980).

Pincite

Opinion

HILL, Judge.

Defendants have failed to comply with App. R 28(b)(3). Neither the assignments of error nor the exception pertinent to defendant’s argument is set forth in the appellate brief. “Exceptions in the record not set out in appellant’s brief ... will be taken as abandoned.” App. R. 28(b)(3). The Rules of Appellate Procedure are mandatory. Craver v. Craver, 298 N.C. 231, 258 S.E. 2d 357 (1979); Pruitt v. Wood, 199 N.C. 788, 156 S.E. 126 (1930); State v. Brown, 42 N.C. App. 724, 257 S.E. 2d 668 (1979), disc. rev. denied, cert. granted, 299 N.C. 123 (1980).

For failing to comply with the Rules of Appellate Procedure, defendants’ appeal is

Dismissed.

Judges Martin (Robert M.) and Arnold concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

HILL, Judge.

Defendants have failed to comply with App. R 28(b)(3). Neither the assignments of error nor the exception pertinent to defendant’s argument is set forth in the appellate brief. “Exceptions in the record not set out in appellant’s brief ... will be taken as abandoned.” App. R. 28(b)(3). The Rules of Appellate Procedure are mandatory. Craver v. Craver, 298 N.C. 231, 258 S.E. 2d 357 (1979); Pruitt v. Wood, 199 N.C. 788, 156 S.E. 126 (1930); State v. Brown, 42 N.C. App. 724, 257 S.E. 2d 668 (1979), disc. rev. denied, cert. granted, 299 N.C. 123 (1980).

For failing to comply with the Rules of Appellate Procedure, defendants’ appeal is

Dismissed.

Judges Martin (Robert M.) and Arnold concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

266 S.E.2d 722, 47 N.C. App. 203, 1980 N.C. App. LEXIS 3003, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lloyd-v-carnation-co-ncctapp-1980.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack