Lloyd v. Carnation Co.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Lloyd v. Carnation Co.

266 S.E.2d 722, 47 N.C. App. 203, 1980 N.C. App. LEXIS 3003

Court of Appeals of North Carolina·Decided June 3, 1980·No. No. 7915SC1120·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

HILL, Judge.

Defendants have failed to comply with App. R 28(b)(3). Neither the assignments of error nor the exception pertinent to defendant’s argument is set forth in the appellate brief. “Exceptions in the record not set out in appellant’s brief ... will be taken as abandoned.” App. R. 28(b)(3). The Rules of Appellate Procedure are mandatory. Craver v. Craver, 298 N.C. 231, 258 S.E. 2d 357 (1979); Pruitt v. Wood, 199 N.C. 788, 156 S.E. 126 (1930); State v. Brown, 42 N.C. App. 724, 257 S.E. 2d 668 (1979), disc. rev. denied, cert. granted, 299 N.C. 123 (1980).

For failing to comply with the Rules of Appellate Procedure, defendants’ appeal is

Dismissed.

Judges Martin (Robert M.) and Arnold concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

HILL, Judge.

Defendants have failed to comply with App. R 28(b)(3). Neither the assignments of error nor the exception pertinent to defendant’s argument is set forth in the appellate brief. “Exceptions in the record not set out in appellant’s brief ... will be taken as abandoned.” App. R. 28(b)(3). The Rules of Appellate Procedure are mandatory. Craver v. Craver, 298 N.C. 231, 258 S.E. 2d 357 (1979); Pruitt v. Wood, 199 N.C. 788, 156 S.E. 126 (1930); State v. Brown, 42 N.C. App. 724, 257 S.E. 2d 668 (1979), disc. rev. denied, cert. granted, 299 N.C. 123 (1980).

For failing to comply with the Rules of Appellate Procedure, defendants’ appeal is

Dismissed.

Judges Martin (Robert M.) and Arnold concur.

Lloyd v. Carnation Co., 266 S.E.2d 722, 47 N.C. App. 203, 1980 N.C. App. LEXIS 3003 (N.C. Ct. App. 1980).

Pincite

266 S.E.2d 722 (Lloyd v. Carnation Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related