Lloyd v. Calhoun

143 P. 458, 82 Wash. 35
Washington Supreme Court·Decided October 8, 1914·No. No. 11566·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinions

[36] On Rehearing.

Main, J.

The report of the majority department opinion in this case, as well as the dissent thereto, may be found in 78 Wash. 438, 139 Pac. 231. A rehearing was granted and the cause was reargued. A majority of the court are of the opinion that the action must be dismissed. Since the reasons why the action cannot be maintained are sufficiently stated in the dissenting opinion -above referred to, there seems no reason for further elaboration. It is sufficient to say that we concur in the views therein expressed, and for the reasons there given, the judgment will be reversed and the cause remanded with direction to dismiss.

Crow, C. J., Gose, Chadwick, Ellis, and Morris, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lloyd v. Calhoun, 143 P. 458, 82 Wash. 35 (Wash. 1914).

143 P. 458 (Lloyd v. Calhoun) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Shelley v. Norman
195 P. 243 (Washington Supreme Court, 1921)
Noyes v. Schoichiro Katsuno
191 P. 419 (Washington Supreme Court, 1920)
Cupples Mercantile Co. v. Bow
189 P. 48 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1920)
Johnson v. J. C. Heitman
88 Wash. 595 (Washington Supreme Court, 1915)