Lloyd v. Bailey
This text of Lloyd v. Bailey (Lloyd v. Bailey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NORTH CAROLINA
No. 181PA15
Filed 29 January 2016
JUSTIN LLOYD
v. DANIEL BAILEY, in his individual and official capacity as Sheriff of Mecklenburg County, and OHIO CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY
On discretionary review pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-31 of a unanimous,
unpublished decision of the Court of Appeals, ___ N.C. App. ___, 772 S.E.2d 874
(2015), reversing and remanding an order entered on 21 May 2014 by Judge Calvin
Murphy in Superior Court, Mecklenburg County. Heard in the Supreme Court on 7
December 2015.
Kennedy, Kennedy, Kennedy and Kennedy, LLP, by Harold L. Kennedy, III and Harvey L. Kennedy, for plaintiff-appellant.
Womble, Carlyle, Sandridge and Rice, LLP, by Sean F. Perrin, for defendant- appellees.
PER CURIAM.
For the reasons stated in Young v. Bailey, ___ N.C. ___, ___ S.E.2d ___ (2016)
(355PA14-2), the decision of the Court of Appeals is affirmed.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Lloyd v. Bailey, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lloyd-v-bailey-nc-2016.