Lloyd v. Ashcroft
This text of Lloyd v. Ashcroft (Lloyd v. Ashcroft) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
__________________________________________ ) ARTHUR L. LLOYD, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 97-1287 (PLF) ) ERIC HOLDER, ) ) Defendant.1 ) __________________________________________)
ORDER
For the reasons stated in the Opinion issued this same day, it is hereby
ORDERED that plaintiff’s motion for equitable relief [148] is DENIED; and it is
FURTHER ORDERED that on or before June 21, 2010, the parties shall file a
joint report regarding plaintiff’s request for attorneys’ fees and costs stating whether they wish to
be referred to settlement discussions with a magistrate judge or court-appointed mediator or, if
they do not wish to be so referred, proposing a briefing schedule.
SO ORDERED.
_/s/___________________________ PAUL L. FRIEDMAN United States District Judge DATE: May 18, 2010
1 The Court has substituted Attorney General Eric Holder as the defendant in place of former Attorney General Michael Mukasey pursuant to Rule 25(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Lloyd v. Ashcroft, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lloyd-v-ashcroft-dcd-2010.