Lloyd v. Ashcroft

CourtDistrict Court, District of Columbia
DecidedMay 18, 2010
DocketCivil Action No. 1997-1287
StatusPublished

This text of Lloyd v. Ashcroft (Lloyd v. Ashcroft) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lloyd v. Ashcroft, (D.D.C. 2010).

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

__________________________________________ ) ARTHUR L. LLOYD, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 97-1287 (PLF) ) ERIC HOLDER, ) ) Defendant.1 ) __________________________________________)

ORDER

For the reasons stated in the Opinion issued this same day, it is hereby

ORDERED that plaintiff’s motion for equitable relief [148] is DENIED; and it is

FURTHER ORDERED that on or before June 21, 2010, the parties shall file a

joint report regarding plaintiff’s request for attorneys’ fees and costs stating whether they wish to

be referred to settlement discussions with a magistrate judge or court-appointed mediator or, if

they do not wish to be so referred, proposing a briefing schedule.

SO ORDERED.

_/s/___________________________ PAUL L. FRIEDMAN United States District Judge DATE: May 18, 2010

1 The Court has substituted Attorney General Eric Holder as the defendant in place of former Attorney General Michael Mukasey pursuant to Rule 25(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Lloyd v. Ashcroft, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lloyd-v-ashcroft-dcd-2010.