Lloyd v. Ashcroft

District Court, District of Columbia·Decided May 18, 2010·No. Civil Action No. 1997-1287·Published

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

__________________________________________ ) ARTHUR L. LLOYD, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 97-1287 (PLF) ) ERIC HOLDER, ) ) Defendant.1 ) __________________________________________)

ORDER

For the reasons stated in the Opinion issued this same day, it is hereby

ORDERED that plaintiff’s motion for equitable relief [148] is DENIED; and it is

FURTHER ORDERED that on or before June 21, 2010, the parties shall file a

joint report regarding plaintiff’s request for attorneys’ fees and costs stating whether they wish to

be referred to settlement discussions with a magistrate judge or court-appointed mediator or, if

they do not wish to be so referred, proposing a briefing schedule.

SO ORDERED.

_/s/___________________________ PAUL L. FRIEDMAN United States District Judge DATE: May 18, 2010

1 The Court has substituted Attorney General Eric Holder as the defendant in place of former Attorney General Michael Mukasey pursuant to Rule 25(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lloyd v. Ashcroft, (D.D.C. 2010).

Lloyd v. Ashcroft (Lloyd v. Ashcroft) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.