Lloyd v. Alexander

5 U.S. 365, 2 L. Ed. 137, 1 Cranch 365, 1803 U.S. LEXIS 370
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided February 10, 1803·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

*366 Marshall, Chief justice.

The law respecting the thirty days notice on a writ of error, and the ten days allowed for filing it, was predicated upon the existing state of things at the time of passing the act; at which time there was no circuit court whose term would not be finished more than forty days before the setting of the supreme court.

The times of the session of the courts have been altered, but no alteration has been made in the law respecting the thirty days notice, which makes it difficult to form a rule in the case.

At present, if the citation has not been served thirty days, the court will not take up the cause until the thirty days have expired, unless the defendant in error shall appear.

A citation not served is as no citation.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lloyd v. Alexander, 5 U.S. 365, 2 L. Ed. 137, 1 Cranch 365, 1803 U.S. LEXIS 370 (1803).

5 U.S. 365 (Lloyd v. Alexander) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gerald Stevens v. State
Court of Appeals of Texas, 2015
McDade, David Kent
Court of Appeals of Texas, 2015
Gayleen S. Todd v. State
Court of Appeals of Texas, 2015
Wesley Perkins v. State
Court of Appeals of Texas, 2015
Kitchen v. Randolph
93 U.S. 86 (Supreme Court, 1876)
Villabolos v. United States
47 U.S. 81 (Supreme Court, 1848)