Lloyd Thomas and Kenneth White v. United States

392 F.2d 44, 1968 U.S. App. LEXIS 7498
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedApril 1, 1968
Docket21780
StatusPublished

This text of 392 F.2d 44 (Lloyd Thomas and Kenneth White v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lloyd Thomas and Kenneth White v. United States, 392 F.2d 44, 1968 U.S. App. LEXIS 7498 (9th Cir. 1968).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

On this appeal from a narcotics (marijuana) conviction, the appellants have two points: First, prejudicial remarks by government counsel and, second, insufficiency of the evidence.

The Assistant United States Attorney was overly expansive in an opening statement, and defendants moved for a mistrial. The motion was denied and the jury properly cautioned to disregard the statements. Approximately the same material later did come into evidence without objection. We find the point without merit.

Further, we find the evidence adequately supports the guilty verdict and judgment of conviction.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
392 F.2d 44, 1968 U.S. App. LEXIS 7498, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lloyd-thomas-and-kenneth-white-v-united-states-ca9-1968.