Lloyd Standley v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedApril 29, 2010
Docket03-09-00645-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Lloyd Standley v. State (Lloyd Standley v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lloyd Standley v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2010).

Opinion

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN




NO. 03-09-00645-CR

Lloyd Standley, Appellant



v.



The State of Texas, Appellee



FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 403RD JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. D-1-DC-09-904065, HONORABLE BRENDA KENNEDY, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

PER CURIAM



Bryce Runkle, attorney for Lloyd Standley appointed on appeal, has filed a motion requesting that he be allowed to withdraw as counsel for appellant. Runkle represents that he has accepted employment as a judicial staff attorney beginning June 1, 2010, and that the code of judicial conduct prohibits him from continuing to represent clients, including appellant.

Runkle also requests that this Court abate this appeal and remand this cause to the trial court for appointment of substitute counsel. Because the reporter's record has been requested but has not yet been filed, appellant's brief is not yet due.

Runkle asserts that he notified appellant of his intent to file these motions. Appellant has not filed any objection to these motions.

Both motions are granted. Runkle is allowed to withdraw as counsel for appellant. This appeal is abated and the cause remanded to the trial court for appointment of new counsel unless appellant retains counsel, waives counsel, or is shown not to be indigent. New counsel shall make an appearance in this Court by filing a letter announcing that he or she represents Standley.

The deadline to file appellant's brief is stayed. Appellant's brief will be due 30 days after (1) the reporter's record is filed, and (2) counsel is appointed, retained, or waived--whichever occurs later.



Before Chief Justice Jones, Justices Pemberton and Waldrop

Abated

Filed: April 29, 2010

Do Not Publish

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Lloyd Standley v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lloyd-standley-v-state-texapp-2010.