Lloyd R. Edick v. United States

264 F.2d 229, 1959 U.S. App. LEXIS 4417
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 14, 1959
Docket13634_1
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 264 F.2d 229 (Lloyd R. Edick v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lloyd R. Edick v. United States, 264 F.2d 229, 1959 U.S. App. LEXIS 4417 (6th Cir. 1959).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This cause came on to be heard on the briefs and the record in the cause. Whereupon, the United States Attorney admitted that appellant had been denied effective assistance of counsel, within the requirement of the Sixth Amendment, upon arraignment and upon the entry of a guilty plea, and it appearing that the action of the United States Attorney in this respect was in consonance with appropriate authority.

The judgment of the United States District Court, in denying the motion of appellant to vacate sentence pronounced upon him, is directed to be set aside and the cause is remanded for further proceedings.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Edmonds v. Floyd
E.D. Michigan, 2020

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
264 F.2d 229, 1959 U.S. App. LEXIS 4417, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lloyd-r-edick-v-united-states-ca6-1959.