Lloyd Lyles v. United States

D.C. Circuit

Lloyd Lyles v. United States

261 F.2d 754, 104 U.S. App. D.C. 288

CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

DecidedNovember 20, 1958

Docket14461

StatusPublished

This text of 261 F.2d 754 (Lloyd Lyles v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lloyd Lyles v. United States, 261 F.2d 754, 104 U.S. App. D.C. 288 (D.C. Cir. 1958).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant seeks reversal of conviction on nine counts of a twenty-four count indictment for illegal sales of narcotics. The convictions rested on three separate transactions in which appellant was found to have participated. A co-defendant, James W. Hunt, was convicted and his conviction affirmed by this court. Hunt v. United States, 1958, 103 U.S.App.D.C. 309, 258 F.2d 161.

We find no error which would warrant reversal and the judgment appealed from is

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant seeks reversal of conviction on nine counts of a twenty-four count indictment for illegal sales of narcotics. The convictions rested on three separate transactions in which appellant was found to have participated. A co-defendant, James W. Hunt, was convicted and his conviction affirmed by this court. Hunt v. United States, 1958, 103 U.S.App.D.C. 309, 258 F.2d 161.

We find no error which would warrant reversal and the judgment appealed from is

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

261 F.2d 754, 104 U.S. App. D.C. 288, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lloyd-lyles-v-united-states-cadc-1958.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack