Lloyd Holmes v. Elaine Chao

61 F. App'x 994
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided April 25, 2003·No. 02-3335·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Lloyd Holmes appeals the district court’s 1 dismissal of his complaint. Having carefully reviewed the record and the parties’ submissions, we agree with the district court that it lacked jurisdiction over Holmes’s action. See Duncan v. Dep’t of Labor, 313 F.3d 445, 446 (8th Cir.2002) (per curiam) (de novo review of dismissal for lack of subject matter jurisdiction).

Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. We also deny Holmes’s pending motions.

1

. The Honorable Carol E. Jackson, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lloyd Holmes v. Elaine Chao, 61 F. App'x 994 (8th Cir. 2003).

61 F. App'x 994 (Lloyd Holmes v. Elaine Chao) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Donald W. Duncan v. Department of Labor
313 F.3d 445 (Eighth Circuit, 2002)