Lloyd F. Sheehan v. Dr. George J. Beto, Director, Texas Department of Corrections
Opinion
Appellant seeks habeas corpus relief from a robbery conviction for which a sentence of ninety-nine years was imposed on January 8, 1962, predicated upon waiver of jury trial and a plea of guilty. Appellant contends that his arrest was without a warrant and without probable cause; that he was deprived of sentencing by a jury; and that his plea of guilty had been coerced by threats and improper promises.
*264 Appellant has failed to avail himself of the Texas habeas corpus remedy provided by Article 11.07 of the Vernon’s Ann.Texas Code of Criminal Procedure. Carroll v. Beto, 5 Cir., 1967, 379 F.2d 329; Ex parte Young, Texas Criminal Appeals, decided on September 14, 1967, 418 S.W.2d 824. Therefore, the judgment of the district court is hereby
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
387 F.2d 263 (Lloyd F. Sheehan v. Dr. George J. Beto, Director, Texas Department of Corrections) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.