Lloyd F. Sheehan v. Dr. George J. Beto, Director, Texas Department of Corrections

Fifth Circuit

Lloyd F. Sheehan v. Dr. George J. Beto, Director, Texas Department of Corrections

387 F.2d 263, 1967 U.S. App. LEXIS 4053

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedDecember 21, 1967

Docket24902

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 387 F.2d 263 (Lloyd F. Sheehan v. Dr. George J. Beto, Director, Texas Department of Corrections) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lloyd F. Sheehan v. Dr. George J. Beto, Director, Texas Department of Corrections, 387 F.2d 263, 1967 U.S. App. LEXIS 4053 (5th Cir. 1967).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks habeas corpus relief from a robbery conviction for which a sentence of ninety-nine years was imposed on January 8, 1962, predicated upon waiver of jury trial and a plea of guilty. Appellant contends that his arrest was without a warrant and without probable cause; that he was deprived of sentencing by a jury; and that his plea of guilty had been coerced by threats and improper promises.

*264 Appellant has failed to avail himself of the Texas habeas corpus remedy provided by Article 11.07 of the Vernon’s Ann.Texas Code of Criminal Procedure. Carroll v. Beto, 5 Cir., 1967, 379 F.2d 329; Ex parte Young, Texas Criminal Appeals, decided on September 14, 1967, 418 S.W.2d 824. Therefore, the judgment of the district court is hereby

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks habeas corpus relief from a robbery conviction for which a sentence of ninety-nine years was imposed on January 8, 1962, predicated upon waiver of jury trial and a plea of guilty. Appellant contends that his arrest was without a warrant and without probable cause; that he was deprived of sentencing by a jury; and that his plea of guilty had been coerced by threats and improper promises.

*264 Appellant has failed to avail himself of the Texas habeas corpus remedy provided by Article 11.07 of the Vernon’s Ann.Texas Code of Criminal Procedure. Carroll v. Beto, 5 Cir., 1967, 379 F.2d 329; Ex parte Young, Texas Criminal Appeals, decided on September 14, 1967, 418 S.W.2d 824. Therefore, the judgment of the district court is hereby

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

387 F.2d 263, 1967 U.S. App. LEXIS 4053, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lloyd-f-sheehan-v-dr-george-j-beto-director-texas-department-of-ca5-1967.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack