Lloyd Brulotte, an Individual, and Melvin J. Newhouse, an Individual v. Laurent Regimbal, an Individual, and Fred Thurmer, an Individual
This text of 368 F.2d 1003 (Lloyd Brulotte, an Individual, and Melvin J. Newhouse, an Individual v. Laurent Regimbal, an Individual, and Fred Thurmer, an Individual) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In our judgment the court’s award of counsel fees for services involved in securing answers to interrogatories was well within the scope of its discretionary authority and did not constitute abuse of discretion. We attach no significance to the fact that the court worded its order in terms of the deposition during the taking of which answers to the interrogatories were refused, nor to the fact that in determining whether the interrogatories should be answered the court examined the incomplete deposition to ascertain the scope of the examination.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
368 F.2d 1003, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lloyd-brulotte-an-individual-and-melvin-j-newhouse-an-individual-v-ca9-1967.