LLOMPART v. Camejo

50 So. 3d 793, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 13, 2011 WL 13686
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJanuary 5, 2011
Docket3D09-3475
StatusPublished

This text of 50 So. 3d 793 (LLOMPART v. Camejo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
LLOMPART v. Camejo, 50 So. 3d 793, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 13, 2011 WL 13686 (Fla. Ct. App. 2011).

Opinion

*794 SUAREZ, J.

Affirmed. See Dudley v. Schmidt, 963 So.2d 297 (Fla. 5th DCA 2007) (citing no statutory authority to award fees as sanctions in a domestic violence injunction proceeding); Bierlin v. Lucibella, 955 So.2d 1206 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007) (holding that there must be a finding that the case failed to present a justiciable issue of fact or law).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bierlin v. Lucibella
955 So. 2d 1206 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2007)
Dudley v. Schmidt
963 So. 2d 297 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2007)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
50 So. 3d 793, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 13, 2011 WL 13686, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/llompart-v-camejo-fladistctapp-2011.