Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Llinas-Flores v. State

Llinas-Flores v. State

755 So. 2d 188, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 4266, 2000 WL 368402
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedApril 12, 2000
DocketNo. 3D00-633
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 755 So. 2d 188 (Llinas-Flores v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Llinas-Flores v. State, 755 So. 2d 188, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 4266, 2000 WL 368402 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The defendant challenges his sentence under the 1995 Sentencing Guidelines on the ground that chapter 95-184, the enacting legislation, violated the single subject requirement of the Florida Constitution. Based upon the Florida Supreme Court’s opinion in Heggs v. State, 25 Fla. L. Weekly S137, - So.2d -, 2000 WL 178052 (Fla. Feb. 17, 2000), we reverse.

Accordingly, we remand to the trial court for resentencing under the guidelines in effect prior to the enactment of chapter 95-184.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Steed v. State
761 So. 2d 490 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
755 So. 2d 188, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 4266, 2000 WL 368402, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/llinas-flores-v-state-fladistctapp-2000.