Llinas-Flores v. State
755 So. 2d 188, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 4266, 2000 WL 368402
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 12, 2000·No. No. 3D00-633·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
The defendant challenges his sentence under the 1995 Sentencing Guidelines on the ground that chapter 95-184, the enacting legislation, violated the single subject requirement of the Florida Constitution. Based upon the Florida Supreme Court’s opinion in Heggs v. State, 25 Fla. L. Weekly S137, - So.2d -, 2000 WL 178052 (Fla. Feb. 17, 2000), we reverse.
Accordingly, we remand to the trial court for resentencing under the guidelines in effect prior to the enactment of chapter 95-184.
Reversed and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Llinas-Flores v. State, 755 So. 2d 188, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 4266, 2000 WL 368402 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).
755 So. 2d 188 (Llinas-Flores v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Steed v. State
761 So. 2d 490 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)