Llewellyn Iron Works v. McLain
This text of 204 P. 872 (Llewellyn Iron Works v. McLain) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
By its complaint filed herein plaintiff sought to have a certain judgment, which was entered in favor of defendant and against plaintiff, set aside and annulled and execution thereof enjoined upon the grounds of alleged fraud, mistake, and want of jurisdiction. A demurrer interposed to the complaint by defendant was sustained without leave to amend, followed by a judgment dismissing the action, from which plaintiff has appealed.
*791 judgment which is made the subject of plaintiff’s attack in this action. Hence the record presents a moot question only, and- for that reason the appeal is dismissed.
A petition for a rehearing of this cause was denied by the district court of appeal on February 3, 1922, and a petition to have the cause heard in the supreme court, after judgment in the district court of appeal, was denied by the supreme court on March 6, 1922.
All the Justices concurred.
Lennon, J., was absent and Richards, J., pro iem., was acting.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
204 P. 872, 56 Cal. App. 790, 1922 Cal. App. LEXIS 604, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/llewellyn-iron-works-v-mclain-calctapp-1922.