Llamos v. Vicente

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Llamos v. Vicente

10 A.D.2d 674, 202 N.Y.S.2d 188, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11476

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 3, 1960

StatusPublished

This text of 10 A.D.2d 674 (Llamos v. Vicente) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Llamos v. Vicente, 10 A.D.2d 674, 202 N.Y.S.2d 188, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11476 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1960).

Pincite

Opinion

Motion granted insofar as to permit the appeal to be heard on the original record, without printing the same, and upon typewritten or mimeographed appellants’ points, on condition that the appellants serve one copy of the typewritten or mimeographed appellants’ points on the attorney for the respondent, and file 6 typewritten or 19 mimeographed copies of appellants’ points, together with the original record, with this court on or before March 31, 1960, with notice of argument for April 12,1960, said appeal to be argued or submitted when reached. Concur — • Botein, P. J., Breitel, McNally, Stevens and Bastow, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion granted insofar as to permit the appeal to be heard on the original record, without printing the same, and upon typewritten or mimeographed appellants’ points, on condition that the appellants serve one copy of the typewritten or mimeographed appellants’ points on the attorney for the respondent, and file 6 typewritten or 19 mimeographed copies of appellants’ points, together with the original record, with this court on or before March 31, 1960, with notice of argument for April 12,1960, said appeal to be argued or submitted when reached. Concur — • Botein, P. J., Breitel, McNally, Stevens and Bastow, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

10 A.D.2d 674, 202 N.Y.S.2d 188, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11476, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/llamos-v-vicente-nyappdiv-1960.