L&L Painting Co., Inc. v. Contract Dispute Resolution Board of the City of New York

New York Court of Appeals

L&L Painting Co., Inc. v. Contract Dispute Resolution Board of the City of New York

926 N.E.2d 1228, 14 N.Y.3d 827, 900 N.Y.S.2d 723

CourtNew York Court of Appeals

DecidedApril 29, 2010

Docket140 SSM 13

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 926 N.E.2d 1228 (L&L Painting Co., Inc. v. Contract Dispute Resolution Board of the City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

L&L Painting Co., Inc. v. Contract Dispute Resolution Board of the City of New York, 926 N.E.2d 1228, 14 N.Y.3d 827, 900 N.Y.S.2d 723 (N.Y. 2010).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs. The City of New York Contract Dispute Resolution Board rationally determined that a discrepancy between a diagram and notes on the contract drawing that is the subject of this dispute created an ambiguity in the contract terms, which petitioner L&L Painting Co., Inc. failed to clarify prior to bidding as the contract required. Therefore, the Board rationally disapproved the claim for additional compensation.

Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Ciparick, Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott and Jones concur.

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI