L.K.M. v. Audrain County Juvenile Office

111 S.W.3d 504, 2003 Mo. App. LEXIS 870
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided June 10, 2003·No. Nos. ED 81572, ED 81579·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

L.K.M. (Mother) appeals the termination of her parental rights to her two daughters, E.K.M. and L.K.M. arguing the evidence does not support termination under Section 211.447.2(1) and (2), RSMo 2000, or Section 211.447.4(1), (2), and (3), RSMo 2000, and that termination was not in either child’s best interest. J.D.M. (Father) also appeals the termination of his parental rights to E.K.M. and L.K.M, arguing the termination was not supported by substantial evidence under the same statutes. Because we find substantial evidence supported the trial court’s determination that the conditions for termination were met and that termination was in the children’s best interests, we affirm.

We . have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parities have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

L.K.M. v. Audrain County Juvenile Office, 111 S.W.3d 504, 2003 Mo. App. LEXIS 870 (Mo. Ct. App. 2003).

111 S.W.3d 504 (L.K.M. v. Audrain County Juvenile Office) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In the Interest of M.D.R.
124 S.W.3d 469 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 2004)
In Re MDR
124 S.W.3d 469 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 2004)