L'Keith Irving v. Corporal Heath Dickson

713 F. App'x 527
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedMarch 2, 2018
Docket17-3246
StatusUnpublished

This text of 713 F. App'x 527 (L'Keith Irving v. Corporal Heath Dickson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
L'Keith Irving v. Corporal Heath Dickson, 713 F. App'x 527 (8th Cir. 2018).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action, L’Keith Irving appeals after the district court—in light of a then-pending proceeding in state court—dismissed Irving’s complaint pre-service and without prejudice, based on abstention under Younger v. Harris, 401 U.S. 37, 91 S.Ct. 746, 27 L.Ed.2d 669 (1971). Irving also moves in this court for leave to amend his complaint.

Upon careful review, we conclude that the dismissal based on Younger was improper. See Norwood v. Dickey, 409 F.3d 901, 903 (8th Cir. 2005) (abuse-of-discretion standard of review); cf. Yamaha Motor Corp., U.S.A. v. Riney, 21 F.3d 793, 797 (8th Cir. 1994) (necessary predicate for Younger dismissal is the opportunity to raise and have timely decided by competent state tribunal the federal issues involved). We thus vacate the dismissal order and remand this case to the district court for further proceedings. We also deny Irving’s motion seeking this court’s permission to amend his complaint.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
713 F. App'x 527, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lkeith-irving-v-corporal-heath-dickson-ca8-2018.