L&K CREATION, LLC, etc. v. WHITE FEATHER MANAGMENT, LLC, etc.

• Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida
• Decided: October 25, 2023
• Docket: 2023-0535
• Status: Published

Opinion

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

Opinion filed October 25, 2023. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D23-0535 Lower Tribunal No. 22-10780 ________________

L&K Creation, LLC, etc., et al., Appellants,

vs.

White Feather Management, LLC, etc., et al., Appellees.

An Appeal from a non-final order from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Charles K. Johnson, Judge.

O'Connor Hernández & Associates, P.A., and Patrick J. O'Connor and Shana Hoo, for appellants.

Barakat + Bossa PLLC, and Brian Barakat, for appellees.

Before EMAS, FERNANDEZ and BOKOR, JJ.

PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Alonso-Llamazares v. Int'l Dermatology Rsch., Inc. 339

So. 3d 385, 392 (Fla. 3d DCA 2022) (observing: “The standard of review of

trial court orders on requests for temporary injunctions is hybrid. To the

extent the trial court’s order is based on factual findings, we will not reverse

unless the trial court abused its discretion; however, any legal conclusions

are subject to de novo review”) (quoting Gainesville Woman Care, LLC v.

State, 210 So. 3d 1243, 1258 (Fla. 2017)) (additional citations omitted);

Briceño v. Bryden Invs., Ltd., 973 So. 2d 614, 616 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008) (“A

trial court has wide discretion to grant or deny a temporary injunction and an

appellate court will not interfere with the exercise of such discretion unless

the party challenging the grant or denial clearly shows an abuse of that

discretion” (quoting Perry & Co. v. First Sec. Ins. Underwriters, Inc., 654 So.

2d 671, 671 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995)). See also Two Islands Dev. Corp. v. Clarke,

157 So. 3d 1081, 1083 (Fla. 3d DCA 2015) (“A court is without jurisdiction to

issue an injunction which would interfere with the rights of those who are not

parties to the action. An injunction can lie only when its scope is limited in

effect to the rights of parties before the court.”)