Livre v. 3 Dolphin Industries Corp.
717 So. 2d 622, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 11970, 1998 WL 646665
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 23, 1998·No. No. 98-1482·Published·Cited by 3 cases
Opinion
Sufficient minimum contacts exist between our forum state and the nonresident defendants “ ‘such that [they] should reasonably anticipate being haled into court’ ” in Florida. Venetian Salami Co. v. Parthenais, 554 So.2d 499, 500 (Fla.1989) (quoting WorldWide Volkswagen Corp. v. Woodson, 444 U.S. 286, 100 S.Ct. 559, 62 L.Ed.2d 490 (1980)). The trial court’s non-final order denying their motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction is, therefore,
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Livre v. 3 Dolphin Industries Corp., 717 So. 2d 622, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 11970, 1998 WL 646665 (Fla. Ct. App. 1998).
717 So. 2d 622 (Livre v. 3 Dolphin Industries Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Miranda v. Glamour Footwear, Corp.
821 So. 2d 1120 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)
8911 Normandy Beach, Inc. v. Kearns
739 So. 2d 156 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)
Torres v. State
717 So. 2d 622 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)