Livny v. Rotella

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Livny v. Rotella

305 A.D.2d 377, 757 N.Y.S.2d 902

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 5, 2003

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 305 A.D.2d 377 (Livny v. Rotella) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Livny v. Rotella, 305 A.D.2d 377, 757 N.Y.S.2d 902 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (DiBlasi, J.), entered January 17, 2002, which denied their motion for partial summary judgment on the issue of liability.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed as academic, without costs or disbursements.

In light of the order of the Supreme Court dated January 30, 2002, dismissing the plaintiff’s action based on his counsel’s failure to appear at a pretrial conference, and a subsequent order of the same court entered April 11, 2002, denying the plaintiffs’ motion to vacate that dismissal, the instant appeal is academic. Altman, J.P., Smith, Adams and Cozier, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (DiBlasi, J.), entered January 17, 2002, which denied their motion for partial summary judgment on the issue of liability.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed as academic, without costs or disbursements.

In light of the order of the Supreme Court dated January 30, 2002, dismissing the plaintiff’s action based on his counsel’s failure to appear at a pretrial conference, and a subsequent order of the same court entered April 11, 2002, denying the plaintiffs’ motion to vacate that dismissal, the instant appeal is academic. Altman, J.P., Smith, Adams and Cozier, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

305 A.D.2d 377, 757 N.Y.S.2d 902, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/livny-v-rotella-nyappdiv-2003.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack