Livingston v. WASHTENAW CIRCUIT JUDGE
762 N.W.2d 493, 483 Mich. 916, 2009 Mich. LEXIS 627
This text of 762 N.W.2d 493 (Livingston v. WASHTENAW CIRCUIT JUDGE) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Livingston v. WASHTENAW CIRCUIT JUDGE, 762 N.W.2d 493, 483 Mich. 916, 2009 Mich. LEXIS 627 (Mich. 2009).
Opinion
Nathaniel LIVINGSTON, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
WASHTENAW CIRCUIT JUDGE, Defendant-Appellee.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
Order
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 4, 2008 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are *494 not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
762 N.W.2d 493, 483 Mich. 916, 2009 Mich. LEXIS 627, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/livingston-v-washtenaw-circuit-judge-mich-2009.