Livingston v. State

241 So. 3d 282
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedApril 30, 2018
DocketNo. 1D17–4125
StatusPublished

This text of 241 So. 3d 282 (Livingston v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Livingston v. State, 241 So. 3d 282 (Fla. Ct. App. 2018).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Alexandra P. Livingston appeals a commitment order finding that involuntary placement was necessary because, in part, she was incapable of surviving alone due to her mental state. See 394.467(1)(a)2.a., Fla. Stat. (2018). She claims that the evidence was inadequate to establish this element. We agree and therefore reverse and order the trial court "to elicit further testimony to establish the statutory criteria, or otherwise order Appellant discharged." Blue v. State , 764 So.2d 697, 699 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000).

REVERSED and REMANDED.

B.L. Thomas, C.J., and Lewis and Makar, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Blue v. State
764 So. 2d 697 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
241 So. 3d 282, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/livingston-v-state-fladistctapp-2018.