Livingston v. State

512 So. 2d 223, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1878, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 9650
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 5, 1987·No. No. 4-86-1426·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the judgment and sentence. The trial court did not err in denying appellant’s request for additional peremptory challenges. See Knight v. State, 338 So.2d 201, 203 (Fla.1976). Nor did it err in disallowing appellant’s challenge to the husband of a former secretary in the state attorney’s office, after he had run our of peremptory challenges. See Christopher v. State, 407 So.2d 198 (Fla.1981). Finally, its admission of color photographs of the victim’s charred bodies was proper. See Henderson v. State, 463 So.2d 196, 200 (Fla.1985).

DOWNEY, J., concurs. GLICKSTEIN, J., concurs specially with opinion. WALDEN, J., concurs in part; dissents in part with opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Livingston v. State, 512 So. 2d 223, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1878, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 9650 (Fla. Ct. App. 1987).

512 So. 2d 223 (Livingston v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kraig Alexander Williams v. State of Florida
258 So. 3d 502 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2018)
Leonard v. State
659 So. 2d 1210 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)