Livingston v. State
This text of 512 So. 2d 223 (Livingston v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
We affirm the judgment and sentence. The trial court did not err in denying appellant’s request for additional peremptory challenges. See Knight v. State, 338 So.2d 201, 203 (Fla.1976). Nor did it err in disallowing appellant’s challenge to the husband of a former secretary in the state attorney’s office, after he had run our of peremptory challenges. See Christopher v. State, 407 So.2d 198 (Fla.1981). Finally, its admission of color photographs of the victim’s charred bodies was proper. See Henderson v. State, 463 So.2d 196, 200 (Fla.1985).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
512 So. 2d 223, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1878, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 9650, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/livingston-v-state-fladistctapp-1987.