Livingston v. Rogers
1 Cai. Cas. 487, 1 Cole. & Cai. Cas. 303
This text of 1 Cai. Cas. 487 (Livingston v. Rogers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Livingston v. Rogers, 1 Cai. Cas. 487, 1 Cole. & Cai. Cas. 303 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1803).
Opinion
The court ruled, that causes which had been noticed for argument, und duly entered by the clerk, if not brought on, are to be renoticed to the clerk for him to re-enter, aa they will not be, of course, carried over to the calendar of the next term.
See Codwise and others v. Hacker, ante, 75, n. (b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
1 Cai. Cas. 487, 1 Cole. & Cai. Cas. 303, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/livingston-v-rogers-nysupct-1803.