Livingston v. Rogers
1 Lock. Rev. Cas. 149
Opinion
The Court of Errors however, reversed the judgment of the Supreme Court, and held that parol evidence of the con[150] tents might he adduced, if the person to whom it was given, prove it to have been lost, and that he might give parol evidence of the contents.
Judgment of reversal.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Livingston v. Rogers, 1 Lock. Rev. Cas. 149 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1799).
1 Lock. Rev. Cas. 149 (Livingston v. Rogers) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.