Livingston v. Platner

1 Cow. 175
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedAugust 15, 1823
StatusPublished
Cited by10 cases

This text of 1 Cow. 175 (Livingston v. Platner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Livingston v. Platner, 1 Cow. 175 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1823).

Opinion

Curia.

To entitle him to have the damages and costs trebled, on motion, the plaintiff must, 1. Count upon the statute". 2. The jury must find, generally, for the plaintiff and assess the single value of the wood, &c. cut or carried off. in terms. If they do not thus find, we.will intend that they [176]*176have found the treble value, or that the defendant brought ]}jmsey w¡£tbn the provisos of the act.

Motion denied

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Rock v. Belmar Contracting Co.
141 Misc. 242 (New York Supreme Court, 1930)
Henning v. Keiper
37 Pa. Super. 488 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1908)
Salmon v. M. E. Blasier Manufacturing Co.
53 Misc. 36 (New York Supreme Court, 1907)
Springer v. Jenkins
84 P. 479 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1906)
Prignitz v. McTiernan
43 N.Y.S. 974 (New York County Courts, 1896)
Hugill v. Reed
8 A. 287 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1887)
Crowell v. Smith
42 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 182 (New York Supreme Court, 1885)
Tait v. Thomas
22 Minn. 537 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1876)
Robinson v. Kinne
1 Thomp. & Cook 60 (New York Supreme Court, 1873)
Chipman v. Emeric
5 Cal. 239 (California Supreme Court, 1855)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 Cow. 175, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/livingston-v-platner-nysupct-1823.