Livingston v. Peacock

Supreme Court of Georgia

Livingston v. Peacock

131 S.E. 687, 161 Ga. 881, 1926 Ga. LEXIS 355

Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided February 19, 1926·No. No. 4968·Published

Opinion

Pee Curiam.

Under the ruling in the case of Livingston v. Peacock, 155 Ga. 261 (116 S. E. 618), which applied the doctrine laid down in Ridgeway v. Ridgeway, 84 Ga. 25 (10 S. E. 495), the judgment of the court below denying a new trial must be reversed.

Judgment reversed.

All the Justices concur. B. R. Calhoun and Hall, Grice & Bloch, for plaintiffs. W. A. Wooten and Roberts & Smith, for defendants.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pee Curiam.

Under the ruling in the case of Livingston v. Peacock, 155 Ga. 261 (116 S. E. 618), which applied the doctrine laid down in Ridgeway v. Ridgeway, 84 Ga. 25 (10 S. E. 495), the judgment of the court below denying a new trial must be reversed.

Judgment reversed.

All the Justices concur. B. R. Calhoun and Hall, Grice & Bloch, for plaintiffs. W. A. Wooten and Roberts & Smith, for defendants.

Livingston v. Peacock, 131 S.E. 687, 161 Ga. 881, 1926 Ga. LEXIS 355 (Ga. 1926).

Pincite

131 S.E. 687 (Livingston v. Peacock) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related