Livingston v. Peacock

Supreme Court of Georgia

Livingston v. Peacock

131 S.E. 687, 161 Ga. 881, 1926 Ga. LEXIS 355

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedFebruary 19, 1926

DocketNo. 4968

StatusPublished

This text of 131 S.E. 687 (Livingston v. Peacock) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Livingston v. Peacock, 131 S.E. 687, 161 Ga. 881, 1926 Ga. LEXIS 355 (Ga. 1926).

Pincite

Opinion

Pee Curiam.

Under the ruling in the case of Livingston v. Peacock, 155 Ga. 261 (116 S. E. 618), which applied the doctrine laid down in Ridgeway v. Ridgeway, 84 Ga. 25 (10 S. E. 495), the judgment of the court below denying a new trial must be reversed.

Judgment reversed.

All the Justices concur. B. R. Calhoun and Hall, Grice & Bloch, for plaintiffs. W. A. Wooten and Roberts & Smith, for defendants.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pee Curiam.

Under the ruling in the case of Livingston v. Peacock, 155 Ga. 261 (116 S. E. 618), which applied the doctrine laid down in Ridgeway v. Ridgeway, 84 Ga. 25 (10 S. E. 495), the judgment of the court below denying a new trial must be reversed.

Judgment reversed.

All the Justices concur. B. R. Calhoun and Hall, Grice & Bloch, for plaintiffs. W. A. Wooten and Roberts & Smith, for defendants.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

131 S.E. 687, 161 Ga. 881, 1926 Ga. LEXIS 355, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/livingston-v-peacock-ga-1926.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack