Livingston v. Ogletree
This text of 56 S.E. 283 (Livingston v. Ogletree) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. This being the first grant of a new trial, and the evidence not demanding the verdict, there was no abuse of discretion on the part of the presiding judge in making such grant.
2. The companion case to the present one is that of Ogletree v. Livingston, 125 Ga. 548, involving substantially the same facts, and in which it was held that there was no abuse of discretion in the first grant of a new trial to the brother of the present plaintiff in error.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
56 S.E. 283, 127 Ga. 205, 1906 Ga. LEXIS 801, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/livingston-v-ogletree-ga-1906.