Livingston v. Livingston

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Livingston v. Livingston

17 A.D.2d 782, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7783

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 9, 1962

StatusPublished

This text of 17 A.D.2d 782 (Livingston v. Livingston) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Livingston v. Livingston, 17 A.D.2d 782, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7783 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1962).

Pincite

Opinion

Order, entered on April 5, 1962, denying petitioner’s application to vacate the order of this court appointing an ancillary committee and for an accounting, and order, entered on the same date, dismissing the petition herein, unanimously affirmed, without costs, upon the facts and in the exercise of discretion. In view of the special circumstances here and the statements made in open court, we deem it improper and unnecessary to pass upon the merits of the petitioner’s application in any respect. Consequently, the determination here is without prejudice to a determination of the proceeding pending in the Court of Probate in Connecticut, and is also without prejudice to such other or further proceedings as may be properly instituted here or in Connecticut. Concur — Rabin, J. P., Valente, McNally, Stevens and Eager, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, entered on April 5, 1962, denying petitioner’s application to vacate the order of this court appointing an ancillary committee and for an accounting, and order, entered on the same date, dismissing the petition herein, unanimously affirmed, without costs, upon the facts and in the exercise of discretion. In view of the special circumstances here and the statements made in open court, we deem it improper and unnecessary to pass upon the merits of the petitioner’s application in any respect. Consequently, the determination here is without prejudice to a determination of the proceeding pending in the Court of Probate in Connecticut, and is also without prejudice to such other or further proceedings as may be properly instituted here or in Connecticut. Concur — Rabin, J. P., Valente, McNally, Stevens and Eager, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

17 A.D.2d 782, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7783, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/livingston-v-livingston-nyappdiv-1962.