Home/California Court of Appeal/Livingston v. Heydon

Livingston v. Heydon

27 Cal. App. 3d 672, 104 Cal. Rptr. 83, 1972 Cal. App. LEXIS 883
CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal
DecidedSeptember 11, 1972
DocketCiv. 30613
StatusPublished
Cited by8 cases

This text of 27 Cal. App. 3d 672 (Livingston v. Heydon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Livingston v. Heydon, 27 Cal. App. 3d 672, 104 Cal. Rptr. 83, 1972 Cal. App. LEXIS 883 (Cal. Ct. App. 1972).

Opinion

Opinion

ELKINGTON, J.

This appeal concerns a superior court judgment declaring that cross (+) marks following the name of a candidate for councilman on a municipal election ballot, but not appearing in whole or in part in the “voting square” following such name, shall not be counted as votes.

The subject ballot was printed in the following form.

*675

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Escalante v. City of Hermosa Beach
195 Cal. App. 3d 1009 (California Court of Appeal, 1987)
Fair v. Hernandez
116 Cal. App. 3d 868 (California Court of Appeal, 1981)
Canal-Randolph Anaheim, Inc. v. JE WILKOSKI
103 Cal. App. 3d 282 (California Court of Appeal, 1980)
Cadiz v. Agricultural Labor Relations Board
92 Cal. App. 3d 365 (California Court of Appeal, 1979)
Teachers Management & Investment Corp. v. City of Santa Cruz
64 Cal. App. 3d 438 (California Court of Appeal, 1976)
Outboard Marine Corp. v. Superior Court
52 Cal. App. 3d 30 (California Court of Appeal, 1975)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
27 Cal. App. 3d 672, 104 Cal. Rptr. 83, 1972 Cal. App. LEXIS 883, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/livingston-v-heydon-calctapp-1972.