Livingston v. Harvey
10 Ind. 218
Opinion
Harvey brought a suit against “ Livingston, Fargo & Co., and Wells, Butterfield & Co., as proprietors of, and doing business under the name' and style of, the American Express Co.”
There was no appearance below. Judgment for plaintiff. Livingston Sf Fargo, Wells Sf Butterfield appeal.
The summons does not give the names of the defendants differently from the complaint. The judgment is against the defendants.
The names should have appeared in some part of the proceedings
The judgment is reversed with costs. Cause remanded, &c.
Footnotes
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Livingston v. Harvey, 10 Ind. 218 (Ind. 1858).
10 Ind. 218 (Livingston v. Harvey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
All Members of AFL-CIO Building Trades Council v. Yost Construction Co.
246 N.E.2d 771 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1969)
Lafayette Chapter of Property Owners Ass'n v. City of Lafayette
157 N.E.2d 287 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1959)
Thomson v. Corn
200 N.E. 737 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1936)
Kale v. Humphrey
1917 OK 438 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1917)
Karges Furniture Co. v. Amalgamated Woodworkers Local Union No. 131
75 N.E. 877 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1905)
MacVeagh v. Wild
95 F. 84 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Indiana, 1899)
Bascom v. Toner
31 N.E. 856 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1892)
Mackenzie v. Board of School Trustees
72 Ind. 189 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1880)
Adams Express Co. v. Hill
43 Ind. 157 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1873)