Livingston v. Harry Sommers Inc.
158 S.E. 617, 43 Ga. App. 367, 1931 Ga. App. LEXIS 368
Opinion
1. There being no assignment of error in the bill of exceptions, the writ of error is dismissed. Civil Code (1910), § 6140; Williams v. Augusta Southern R. Co., 98 Ga. 392 (25 S. E. 557); Winn v. State, 124 Ga. 811 (53 S. E. 318) ; Griffin v. Garrard, 42 Ga. App. 337 (156 S. E. 270).
2. Moreover, no error appears. Civil Code (1910), § 3298; Cody & Edgar v. Automobile Financing Inc., 37 Ga. App. 452 (140 S. E. 634).
Writ of error dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Livingston v. Harry Sommers Inc., 158 S.E. 617, 43 Ga. App. 367, 1931 Ga. App. LEXIS 368 (Ga. Ct. App. 1931).
158 S.E. 617 (Livingston v. Harry Sommers Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Armstrong v. State
128 S.E.2d 350 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1962)
Rabhan v. Rabhan
195 S.E. 193 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1938)