Livingston v. Colvin

615 F. App'x 159
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedSeptember 9, 2015
DocketNo. 14-2189
StatusPublished

This text of 615 F. App'x 159 (Livingston v. Colvin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Livingston v. Colvin, 615 F. App'x 159 (4th Cir. 2015).

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Geneva B. Livingston appeals the district court’s order upholding the Commissioner’s denial of Livingston’s application for disability benefits and supplemental se[160]*160curity income. Our review of the Commissioner’s determination is limited to evaluating whether the findings are supported by substantial evidence and whether the correct law was applied. See Mascio v. Colvin, 780 F.3d 632, 634 (4th Cir.2015). We have thoroughly reviewed the parties’ briefs, the administrative record, and the joint appendix, and we discern no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. Livingston v. Colvin, No. l:ll-cv-00501, 2014 WL 4850447 (M.D.N.C. Sept. 29, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bonnilyn Mascio v. Carolyn Colvin
780 F.3d 632 (Fourth Circuit, 2015)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
615 F. App'x 159, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/livingston-v-colvin-ca4-2015.