Livingston v. Columbian Insurance
2 Cai. Cas. 28, 1 Cole. & Cai. Cas. 339
Opinion
The court ought to be satisfied that the cause is either intricate or important, (vide ante, vol. 1, p. 498; Spencer v. Sampson, Foot v. Croswell,) and that by affidavit.
1ST. B. The court seemed inclined against the granting of struck juries, as a matter of course, on a mere formal affidavit.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Livingston v. Columbian Insurance, 2 Cai. Cas. 28, 1 Cole. & Cai. Cas. 339 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1804).
2 Cai. Cas. 28 (Livingston v. Columbian Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Lommen v. Minneapolis Gaslight Co.
33 L.R.A. 437 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1896)
Walsh v. Sun Mutual Insurance
17 Abb. Pr. 356 (The Superior Court of New York City, 1864)