Livingston v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.

534 So. 2d 1251, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 5677, 1988 WL 137221
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 21, 1988·No. No. 88-1909·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We agree with the appellant that the trial judge erred in granting the appellee’s motion for summary judgment. We find that there is a genuine issue of material fact relating to the causal connection between the use of a motor vehicle and appellant’s injuries.

Accordingly, we reverse the order and remand for further proceedings.

SCHEB, A.C.J., and DANAHY and HALL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Livingston v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co., 534 So. 2d 1251, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 5677, 1988 WL 137221 (Fla. Ct. App. 1988).

534 So. 2d 1251 (Livingston v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related