Livingston County Child Support Collection Unit v. Schneider

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Livingston County Child Support Collection Unit v. Schneider

306 A.D.2d 931, 762 N.Y.S.2d 324, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6800

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 13, 2003

StatusPublished

This text of 306 A.D.2d 931 (Livingston County Child Support Collection Unit v. Schneider) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Livingston County Child Support Collection Unit v. Schneider, 306 A.D.2d 931, 762 N.Y.S.2d 324, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6800 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

—Appeal from an order of Family Court, Livingston County (Cicoria, J.), entered February 4, 2002, which vacated the order suspending commitment and committed respondent to the custody of the Livingston County Sheriff.

It is hereby ordered that said appeal be and the same hereby is unanimously dismissed without costs.

Memorandum: The appeal from the order entered February 4, 2002 is dismissed because that order was superseded by an order entered February 22, 2002 (see Matter of Eric D. [appeal No. 1], 162 AD2d 1051 [1990]). No appeal lies from an order that has been superseded by an amended order (see id.). Present — Pigott, Jr., P.J., Green, Pine, Wisner and Lawton, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal from an order of Family Court, Livingston County (Cicoria, J.), entered February 4, 2002, which vacated the order suspending commitment and committed respondent to the custody of the Livingston County Sheriff.

It is hereby ordered that said appeal be and the same hereby is unanimously dismissed without costs.

Memorandum: The appeal from the order entered February 4, 2002 is dismissed because that order was superseded by an order entered February 22, 2002 (see Matter of Eric D. [appeal No. 1], 162 AD2d 1051 [1990]). No appeal lies from an order that has been superseded by an amended order (see id.). Present — Pigott, Jr., P.J., Green, Pine, Wisner and Lawton, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

306 A.D.2d 931, 762 N.Y.S.2d 324, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6800, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/livingston-county-child-support-collection-unit-v-schneider-nyappdiv-2003.