Liverpool & Great Western Steam Co. v. Insurance Co. of North America

129 U.S. 464, 9 S. Ct. 480, 32 L. Ed. 800, 1889 U.S. LEXIS 1701
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided March 5, 1889·No. 6·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

This case was argued and decided with that of Liverpool & Great Western Steam Co. v. Phenix Ins. Co., supra, and was substantial^ like it,, except that the through bills of lading were for transportation by the New York .Central and Hudson River Railroad Company and the Guión Line Steamship Company from Buffalo in the State of New York to Liverpool via New York. The Circuit Court’s findings of •fact, conclusions of law and opinion are printed in 22 Blatchford, 372, and in 22 Fed. Rep. 715.

Decree affirmed.

Mr. Chief Justice Fuller a,nd Mr. Justice Lamar were not members of the court when this case was argued, .and took no part' in its decision.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Liverpool & Great Western Steam Co. v. Insurance Co. of North America, 129 U.S. 464, 9 S. Ct. 480, 32 L. Ed. 800, 1889 U.S. LEXIS 1701 (1889).

129 U.S. 464 (Liverpool & Great Western Steam Co. v. Insurance Co. of North America) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

The Schickshinny
45 F. Supp. 813 (S.D. Georgia, 1942)
Johnson v. S. S. Schickshinny
45 F. Supp. 813 (S.D. Georgia, 1942)
Queen Ins. Co. v. Galveston, H. & S. A. Ry. Co.
3 S.W.2d 419 (Texas Commission of Appeals, 1928)
Hartford Fire Ins. Co. v. Triplett
223 S.W. 305 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1920)