Liverpool & Great Western Steam Co. v. Insurance Co. of North America

Supreme Court

Liverpool & Great Western Steam Co. v. Insurance Co. of North America

129 U.S. 464, 9 S. Ct. 480, 32 L. Ed. 800, 1889 U.S. LEXIS 1701

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedMarch 5, 1889

Docket6

StatusPublished

Cited by6 cases

This text of 129 U.S. 464 (Liverpool & Great Western Steam Co. v. Insurance Co. of North America) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Liverpool & Great Western Steam Co. v. Insurance Co. of North America, 129 U.S. 464, 9 S. Ct. 480, 32 L. Ed. 800, 1889 U.S. LEXIS 1701 (1889).

Pincite

Opinion

This case was argued and decided with that of Liverpool & Great Western Steam Co. v. Phenix Ins. Co., supra, and was substantial^ like it,, except that the through bills of lading were for transportation by the New York .Central and Hudson River Railroad Company and the Guión Line Steamship Company from Buffalo in the State of New York to Liverpool via New York. The Circuit Court’s findings of •fact, conclusions of law and opinion are printed in 22 Blatchford, 372, and in 22 Fed. Rep. 715.

Decree affirmed.

Mr. Chief Justice Fuller a,nd Mr. Justice Lamar were not members of the court when this case was argued, .and took no part' in its decision.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

This case was argued and decided with that of Liverpool & Great Western Steam Co. v. Phenix Ins. Co., supra, and was substantial^ like it,, except that the through bills of lading were for transportation by the New York .Central and Hudson River Railroad Company and the Guión Line Steamship Company from Buffalo in the State of New York to Liverpool via New York. The Circuit Court’s findings of •fact, conclusions of law and opinion are printed in 22 Blatchford, 372, and in 22 Fed. Rep. 715.

Decree affirmed.

Mr. Chief Justice Fuller a,nd Mr. Justice Lamar were not members of the court when this case was argued, .and took no part' in its decision.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

129 U.S. 464, 9 S. Ct. 480, 32 L. Ed. 800, 1889 U.S. LEXIS 1701, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/liverpool-great-western-steam-co-v-insurance-co-of-north-america-scotus-1889.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack