Livermore v. Campbell
This text of 52 Cal. 75 (Livermore v. Campbell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The question underlying the discussion herein is, whether the order of the District Court setting aside the judgment entered by the Clerk is- appealable.
[77]*77Section 989 of the Code of Civil Procedure gives an appeal: In the first subdivision from a final judgment, etc.—in the third subdivision from a special order made after final judgment.
It has been repeatedly held by this Court that an appeal lies from a void judgment, and it follows that an order setting aside a judgment in form, on the ground that it is in fact invalid, is also appealable, and until such appeal is heard this Court will not inquire whether the Court or Clerk had or had not jurisdiction to enter the judgment.
The case being in this Court by appeal, the Court below cannot proceed in it until the appeal is heard and determined. (Code of Civil Procedure, sec. 946.)
Let a peremptory writ of prohibition issue as prayed for.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
52 Cal. 75, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/livermore-v-campbell-cal-1877.