Livermore v. Campbell

52 Cal. 75
CourtCalifornia Supreme Court
DecidedJuly 1, 1877
DocketNo. 5556
StatusPublished
Cited by22 cases

This text of 52 Cal. 75 (Livermore v. Campbell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Livermore v. Campbell, 52 Cal. 75 (Cal. 1877).

Opinion

By the Court :

The question underlying the discussion herein is, whether the order of the District Court setting aside the judgment entered by the Clerk is- appealable.

[77]*77Section 989 of the Code of Civil Procedure gives an appeal: In the first subdivision from a final judgment, etc.—in the third subdivision from a special order made after final judgment.

It has been repeatedly held by this Court that an appeal lies from a void judgment, and it follows that an order setting aside a judgment in form, on the ground that it is in fact invalid, is also appealable, and until such appeal is heard this Court will not inquire whether the Court or Clerk had or had not jurisdiction to enter the judgment.

The case being in this Court by appeal, the Court below cannot proceed in it until the appeal is heard and determined. (Code of Civil Procedure, sec. 946.)

Let a peremptory writ of prohibition issue as prayed for.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Phelan v. Superior Court
217 P.2d 951 (California Supreme Court, 1950)
Shrimpton v. Superior Court of L. A.Cty.
139 P.2d 889 (California Supreme Court, 1943)
Casner v. Superior Court
74 P.2d 298 (California Court of Appeal, 1937)
Colby v. Pierce
59 P.2d 1046 (California Court of Appeal, 1936)
State Ex Rel. Monteath v. District Court
37 P.2d 567 (Montana Supreme Court, 1934)
Potvin v. Pacific Greyhound Lines, Inc.
20 P.2d 129 (California Court of Appeal, 1933)
Martin v. Miller
224 P. 783 (California Court of Appeal, 1924)
State Ex Rel. Coonley v. Hall
246 S.W. 35 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1922)
Holland v. Superior Court of S.F.
146 P. 878 (California Supreme Court, 1915)
Parkside Realty Co. v. MacDonald
139 P. 805 (California Supreme Court, 1914)
Shumake v. Shumake
107 P. 42 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1910)
Vosburg v. Vosburg
70 P. 473 (California Supreme Court, 1902)
Hoover v. Hoover
65 P. 796 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1901)
Southern California Railway Co. v. Superior Court
59 P. 789 (California Supreme Court, 1899)
White v. Superior Court
42 P. 471 (California Supreme Court, 1895)
Kaufman v. Superior Court
41 P. 476 (California Supreme Court, 1895)
Davis v. Wallace
38 P. 1107 (California Supreme Court, 1895)
State ex rel. Johnson v. Case
37 P. 95 (Montana Supreme Court, 1894)
Fox v. Nachtsheim
29 P. 140 (Washington Supreme Court, 1892)
Sioux Falls Nat. Bank v. McKee
50 N.W. 1057 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1892)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
52 Cal. 75, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/livermore-v-campbell-cal-1877.