Lively v. State
This text of 403 S.E.2d 810 (Lively v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Steven Ray Lively appeals from his conviction for the murder of John Larimore Thornton and raises the sufficiency of the evidence as [246]*246his only enumeration of error.1 We affirm.
The victim’s body was found near Lake Allatoona in Bartow County on April 5, 1989. The victim had been shot twice in the head. Lively was later arrested in possession of a stolen car and the murder weapon, as shown by ballistics tests. One witness testified Lively told him, “he just throwed the gun up and shot him, said he had to see what it felt like.” Another witness, a jailer, said Lively, referring to another crime in that county, stated, “It’s not like I killed the Governor’s aunt or anything like that ... I just shot [him] in the back of the head twice. ...”
At trial, Lively claimed he shot the victim by accident when the victim reached for the gun and it went off, and he then panicked and fled to Chattanooga.
Lively relies solely on the sufficiency of the evidence, contending that the state’s case did not overcome his own noncriminal version of the events. Having reviewed the evidence in the light most favorable to the jury’s determination, however, we conclude that a rational trier of fact could have found the defendant guilty of murder beyond a reasonable doubt. Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U. S. 307 (99 SC 2781, 61 LE2d 560) (1979); Crawford v. State, 245 Ga. 89, 90 (263 SE2d 131) (1980).
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
403 S.E.2d 810, 261 Ga. 245, 1991 Ga. LEXIS 196, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lively-v-state-ga-1991.