Lively v. State

264 So. 3d 367
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 15, 2019
DocketCase No. 5D18-2114
StatusPublished

This text of 264 So. 3d 367 (Lively v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lively v. State, 264 So. 3d 367 (Fla. Ct. App. 2019).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Douglas Lively appeals the summary denial of his motion for postconviction relief filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. We affirm as to Grounds One, Two, Three, Five, Six, Seven, Eight, Nine, Ten, Eleven, Twelve, and Thirteen. However, because Lively should have been given the opportunity to amend Ground Four1 to state a facially sufficient claim, we reverse the summary denial of that claim and remand with instructions that he be given the opportunity to do so. See Spera v. State, 971 So.2d 754 (Fla. 2007) ; see also McGill v. State, 157 So.3d 433, 434 (Fla. 4th DCA 2015) (noting earlier motions denied as too long, and interpreting Mancino v. State, 10 So.3d 1203, 1204 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009), as drawing distinction between rejections for form and rejections *368for insufficiency). Additionally, because the trial court failed to consider Grounds Fourteen and Fifteen, we remand for consideration of those claims as well. See Purse v. State, 185 So.3d 627 (Fla. 5th DCA 2016) (reversing and remanding where trial court failed to address claim raised in rule 3.850 motion); Hatcher v. State, 114 So.3d 1019 (Fla. 5th DCA 2012) ; Bridges v. State, 81 So.3d 616, 618 (Fla. 5th DCA 2012).

AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part, and REMANDED.

EVANDER, C.J., BERGER and HARRIS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Mancino v. State
10 So. 3d 1203 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2009)
Hoffman v. State
571 So. 2d 449 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1990)
Spera v. State
971 So. 2d 754 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2007)
Bridges v. State
81 So. 3d 616 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2012)
Rodney McGill v. State
157 So. 3d 433 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2015)
Hatcher v. State
114 So. 3d 1019 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2012)
Purse v. State
185 So. 3d 627 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2016)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
264 So. 3d 367, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lively-v-state-fladistctapp-2019.