Lively v. State
This text of 264 So. 3d 367 (Lively v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Douglas Lively appeals the summary denial of his motion for postconviction relief filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. We affirm as to Grounds One, Two, Three, Five, Six, Seven, Eight, Nine, Ten, Eleven, Twelve, and Thirteen. However, because Lively should have been given the opportunity to amend Ground Four1 to state a facially sufficient claim, we reverse the summary denial of that claim and remand with instructions that he be given the opportunity to do so. See Spera v. State,
AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part, and REMANDED.
EVANDER, C.J., BERGER and HARRIS, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
264 So. 3d 367, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lively-v-state-fladistctapp-2019.