Lively v. State
180 So. 3d 244, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 19207, 2015 WL 9319140
Opinion
Patrick Lively appeals from an order denying his pro se motion, made within two years after his conviction and sentence were affirmed by this court, to dismiss the information against him. While not included in a Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 motion, we treat the motion to dismiss as such because there is no other mechanism by which the court below, and thus this court, could address it. Treating it as such, we affirm the order on appeal denying Lively’s motion.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Lively v. State, 180 So. 3d 244, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 19207, 2015 WL 9319140 (Fla. Ct. App. 2015).
180 So. 3d 244 (Lively v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.