Lively v. Hunter

52 S.E. 544, 124 Ga. 516, 1905 Ga. LEXIS 768
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided December 21, 1905·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

EvaNS, J.

(After stating the facts.) The judgment complained of was rendered at the hearing fixed on motion of the defendants to dissolve an interlocutory injunction. The only question before the court on that hearing was the propriety of dissolving or vacating the restraining order in the main case, which was still pending. The main case was not before the court on its merits, and the court was without jurisdiction to enter a final decree disposing of it.

Judgment reversed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lively v. Hunter, 52 S.E. 544, 124 Ga. 516, 1905 Ga. LEXIS 768 (Ga. 1905).

52 S.E. 544 (Lively v. Hunter) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Jones v. Graham
1 S.E.2d 635 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1939)
Norris v. City of Lawton
1915 OK 160 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1915)