Lively v. Hunter
This text of 52 S.E. 544 (Lively v. Hunter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
(After stating the facts.) The judgment complained of was rendered at the hearing fixed on motion of the defendants to dissolve an interlocutory injunction. The only question before the court on that hearing was the propriety of dissolving or vacating the restraining order in the main case, which was still pending. The main case was not before the court on its merits, and the court was without jurisdiction to enter a final decree disposing of it.
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
52 S.E. 544, 124 Ga. 516, 1905 Ga. LEXIS 768, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lively-v-hunter-ga-1905.