Lively v. Employment Division

680 P.2d 391, 68 Or. App. 46, 1984 Ore. App. LEXIS 3239
Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided May 2, 1984·No. 83-AB-909-A; 83-AB-909-B; CA A28647·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Petitioner seeks judicial review of a decision of the Employment Appeals Board that affirmed a referee’s decision disqualifying him from receiving unemployment compensation benefits because he voluntarily left his employment without good cause.1 A detailed statement of the facts in this case — such as they are — would benefit neither bench nor bar. Petitioner argues — and we agree — that none of the findings of fact in any of the decisions of the referee or the EAB support its conclusion. An examination of the record further shows that there is no way the findings of fact could be recast to justify petitioner’s dismissal and still be supported by substantial evidence.

It follows that this case should be reversed, rather than merely remanded. See Sothras v. Employment Division, 48 Or App 69, 616 P2d 524 (1980).

Reversed.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lively v. Employment Division, 680 P.2d 391, 68 Or. App. 46, 1984 Ore. App. LEXIS 3239 (Or. Ct. App. 1984).

680 P.2d 391 (Lively v. Employment Division) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hoard v. Employment Division
717 P.2d 664 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1986)
De St. Germain v. Employment Division
703 P.2d 986 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1985)