Lively v. Ark. Dep't of Human Servs.
This text of 2014 Ark. 464 (Lively v. Ark. Dep't of Human Servs.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Cite as 2014 Ark. 464
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS No. CV-14-901
JONATHAN LIVELY Opinion Delivered November 6, 2014 APPELLANT MOTION TO FILE BELATED V. NOTICE OF APPEAL
ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES GRANTED. APPELLEE
PER CURIAM
Appellant Jonathan Lively, by and through his attorney, Adell Ralston, has filed a
motion to file a belated notice of appeal. An order terminating Lively’s parental rights was
entered on July 11, 2014. Pursuant to Arkansas Supreme Court Rule 6–9(b)(1) (2012),
Lively’s notice of appeal was required to be filed no later than August 1, 2014. An amended
notice of appeal and designation of record was filed on August 25, 2014.
Where an attorney candidly admits fault, we will grant the motion for belated appeal,
and a copy of the opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.
Mann v. Arkansas Dep’t of Human Servs., 2012 Ark. 96 (per curiam). Attorney Ralston admits
that due to her lack of diligence, the notice of appeal was not timely filed. Accordingly, we
grant the motion to file a belated notice of appeal and forward a copy of this opinion to the
Committee.
Motion to file belated appeal granted. Adell Ralston, pro se appellant. No response.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2014 Ark. 464, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lively-v-ark-dept-of-human-servs-ark-2014.