Livecchi v. Continental Securities Corp.

100 F. App'x 860
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit
DecidedJune 10, 2004
DocketNo. 03-6155
StatusPublished

This text of 100 F. App'x 860 (Livecchi v. Continental Securities Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Livecchi v. Continental Securities Corp., 100 F. App'x 860 (2d Cir. 2004).

Opinion

SUMMARY ORDER

UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the appeal be and it hereby is DISMISSED for lack of appellate jurisdiction.

Plaintiff-appellant Charles Livecehi appeals from a July 1, 2003 order of the United States District Court for the Western District of New York (David G. Larimer, District Judge) granting defendant-appellee Continental Securities Corporation’s motion for summary judgment on Liveechi’s claims of discriminatory conduct and breach of contract. The case remains pending against defendants the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development and the Rochester Housing Authority.1

Absent an express direction for the entry of judgment against one party, an order by a district court that “adjudicates fewer than all the claims” in a case is not a final order and is not immediately appeal-able. Ruffolo v. Oppenheimer & Co., 949 F.2d 33, 35-36 (2d Cir.1991); see 28 U.S.C. §§ 1291, 1292(a)-(b); Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b).

No such direction having been made here, Livecchi’s appeal is hereby DISMISSED for lack of appellate jurisdiction.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
100 F. App'x 860, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/livecchi-v-continental-securities-corp-ca2-2004.