Live v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Live v. State

567 So. 2d 48, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 7356, 1990 WL 140280

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedSeptember 26, 1990

DocketNo. 88-01601

StatusPublished

This text of 567 So. 2d 48 (Live v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Live v. State, 567 So. 2d 48, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 7356, 1990 WL 140280 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We hold that the trial judge erred in imposing costs without affording the appellant his due process rights of notice and an opportunity to be heard. Wood v. State, 544 So.2d 1004 (Fla.1989). We find no merit in the other issue presented by the appellant.

Accordingly, we strike the imposition of costs without prejudice to the state to seek reimposition after proper notice. In all other respects, the convictions and sentences are affirmed.

LEHAN, A.C.J., and FRANK and PATTERSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We hold that the trial judge erred in imposing costs without affording the appellant his due process rights of notice and an opportunity to be heard. Wood v. State, 544 So.2d 1004 (Fla.1989). We find no merit in the other issue presented by the appellant.

Accordingly, we strike the imposition of costs without prejudice to the state to seek reimposition after proper notice. In all other respects, the convictions and sentences are affirmed.

LEHAN, A.C.J., and FRANK and PATTERSON, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

567 So. 2d 48, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 7356, 1990 WL 140280, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/live-v-state-fladistctapp-1990.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack