Livadas v. Livadas

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Livadas v. Livadas

827 So. 2d 377, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 14572, 2002 WL 31250843

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 9, 2002·No. No. 1D02-239·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We dismiss appellant’s challenge to the trial court’s decision that appellee is entitled to an award of attorney’s fees as not ripe for review. See Miller v. Miller, 801 So.2d 1056 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001). We conclude that appellant’s remaining arguments are without merit and, accordingly, affirm as to them.

AFFIRMED IN PART and DISMISSED IN PART.

MINER, KAHN and WEBSTER, JJ„ concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We dismiss appellant’s challenge to the trial court’s decision that appellee is entitled to an award of attorney’s fees as not ripe for review. See Miller v. Miller, 801 So.2d 1056 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001). We conclude that appellant’s remaining arguments are without merit and, accordingly, affirm as to them.

AFFIRMED IN PART and DISMISSED IN PART.

MINER, KAHN and WEBSTER, JJ„ concur.

Livadas v. Livadas, 827 So. 2d 377, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 14572, 2002 WL 31250843 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

827 So. 2d 377 (Livadas v. Livadas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related