Livadas v. Livadas

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Livadas v. Livadas

827 So. 2d 377, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 14572, 2002 WL 31250843

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedOctober 9, 2002

DocketNo. 1D02-239

StatusPublished

This text of 827 So. 2d 377 (Livadas v. Livadas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Livadas v. Livadas, 827 So. 2d 377, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 14572, 2002 WL 31250843 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We dismiss appellant’s challenge to the trial court’s decision that appellee is entitled to an award of attorney’s fees as not ripe for review. See Miller v. Miller, 801 So.2d 1056 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001). We conclude that appellant’s remaining arguments are without merit and, accordingly, affirm as to them.

AFFIRMED IN PART and DISMISSED IN PART.

MINER, KAHN and WEBSTER, JJ„ concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We dismiss appellant’s challenge to the trial court’s decision that appellee is entitled to an award of attorney’s fees as not ripe for review. See Miller v. Miller, 801 So.2d 1056 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001). We conclude that appellant’s remaining arguments are without merit and, accordingly, affirm as to them.

AFFIRMED IN PART and DISMISSED IN PART.

MINER, KAHN and WEBSTER, JJ„ concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

827 So. 2d 377, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 14572, 2002 WL 31250843, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/livadas-v-livadas-fladistctapp-2002.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack