Liu v. Mandina

396 So. 2d 1155, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 19010
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 25, 1981·No. No. 80-1255·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a summary judgment in favor of the defendant on a complaint for malicious prosecution.

One of the six essential elements of malicious prosecution is the bona fide termination of a criminal procedure in plaintiff’s favor. Coleman v. Collins, 384 So.2d 229 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980).

Where the nolle prosequi is obtained by the accused upon a promise of restitution, it is not a bona fide termination in plaintiff’s favor. Gatto v. Publix Supermarket, Inc., 387 So.2d 377 (Fla. 3rd DCA 1980).

In this case it appears that there is still a genuine issue whether the nolle prosequi had been obtained as a result of a promise to pay. Assistant State Attorney Forman and Attorney Stone differ. It is defendant’s burden to establish that the decision to nolle prosequi was based solely on restitution.

There being a genuine issue of a material fact, we reverse.

REVERSED.

MOORE and HURLEY, JJ., and SHARP, G. KENDALL, Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Liu v. Mandina, 396 So. 2d 1155, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 19010 (Fla. Ct. App. 1981).

396 So. 2d 1155 (Liu v. Mandina) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Alamo Rent-A-Car, Inc. v. Mancusi
632 So. 2d 1352 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1994)
Alamo Rent-A-Car, Inc. v. Mancusi
599 So. 2d 1010 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)